Contrabass Digest

To subscribe or unsubscribe, email gdgreen@contrabass.com

1998-05-31

list                           Sun, 31 May 1998           Volume 1 : Number 86
In this issue:

        anyone here?

        Quiet time

       lower saxes

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Sun, 31 May 1998 14:10:12 -0600
From: "Michael B. McDonald" <mmcdonal@silver.sdsmt.edu>
To: "list@contrabass.com" <list@contrabass.com>
Subject: anyone here?
Is this list still functioning?
Michael McDonald
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 31 May 1998 17:27:08, -0500
From: KUUP84A@prodigy.com (MR MARK A TRINKO)
To: list@contrabass.com
Subject: Quiet time
-- [ From: Mark Trinko * EMC.Ver #2.5.3 ] --
Actually it was quite nice to have the Contrabass-List quiet for a while
. I only wish the IDRS-L and doublereed-L would quiet down a little.
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 31 May 1998 17:27:50 -0500
From: "Philip Newton" <plnewton@tvec.net>
To: <list@contrabass.com>
Subject: lower saxes
I was just reading the saxophone pattent and came across a question. If
Sax thought that the lower saxes would prove the most useful, by lower I
mean bari downwards, then why do we never see these instruments. Also if
the subcontrabass sax was actually in the original pattent why has none
ever appeared, other than the Conns which are still elusive. (I won't
mention the "fake")
Just wondering,
Bret Newton
------------------------------
End of list V1 #87
******************
End of list V1 #86
******************

Next Digest ->
Previous Digest <-
Index
Top